Me, directing a scene from our 2009 production of MIDDLE AGED WHITE GUYS at Talon Winery. |
* Controls the
artistic direction and VISION of the production. The director is the person
responsible for how the show looks, sounds and feels. This is a very complex
position, that often times is misunderstood. An old instructor of mine used to
say "If a show is GREAT, the actors get the credit...but if the show is
BAD, the director gets the blame." As someone who has directed over 50
shows, I can tell you that truer words were never spoken!
HISTORY OF THE
DIRECTOR-
The history of the
position known as the director is an interesting one. The position, as we know
it now, has only been around for some 150 years (which in the scheme of Theatre
history is NOT very long) There has always been someone who provided some of
the functions we now equate with the director, but the position didn't come
into it's own until sometime in the mid 19th century.
The text divides the
history into three phases:
1) Teacher Director
phase- from the beginnings of Greek Theatre, there was always a TEACHER who
would instruct and guide the actors. This person was referred to as the
didaskalos (meaning teacher).
2) Realistic
Director phase- As the theatre began to move in a more realistic fashion, and
strive for a sense of verisimilitude (meaning "very similar to life), the
position of the director began to flesh itself out. One man, George II (also
known as the Duke of Saxe Meiningen) would become the father of modern
directing and help establish the director as a separate and important
entity(circa 1874 ). The Duke of Saxe-Meiningen toured Europe with his troupe
of actors. The tour showed theatre artists the value and artistic opportunity a
director could have. For six years prior to the tour, the Duke of
Saxe-Meiningen implemented basic directing principles which continue to be
used, if modified, today. His principles included intensive rehearsals, the
demand for disciplined and ensemble acting (NO stars), historically accurate
sets and costumes, the directorial need for vision and total control over all
aspects of the production, and the value of minute detail. Many of the Duke's
methods are still in place to this day.
3) Stylized
Director Phase-On the heels of the realism movement came a backlash (around
the early part of the 20th century) and a group of theatre practitioners who
were more interested in creating "Theatrical brilliance" than in any
sense of verisimilitude. They helped to solidify the director's position as a
visionary, in total artistic control.
A theorist named
Edward Gordon Craig wrote in a now famous essay that the director should be
"likened unto the Captain of the ship".
DIRECTORIAL FUNCTIONS"
The text divides the
functions of the Director into two separate phases, each with separate duties.
1) Preparatory
phase (things done BEFORE rehearsal begins). These include:
a- play selection
b- concept
c- designer selection
/ design phase (The text separates these- I feel they go hand in hand)
d- casting (The old
adage says that casting is "90% of directing! Incidentally, film director
Woody Allen says that 90% of directing is "showing up")
2) Implementation
phase: (From rehearsal to the stage.) These include:
a- staging (blocking,
choreography, etc)
b- actor coaching
c- Pacing ( a surefire
way to know if a director has not done their job is to pay attention to the
overall pacing of the show. Is it too slow, does it seem to drag or are things
firing by so fast you can barely catch the meaning? This is a crucial and very difficult
aspect of the job.
d- coordinating (In
essence, tying together all the loose ends)
e- production-
Strangely enough, the director has no real "job" during this time.
His/Her job is actually finished AFTER final dress rehearsal. The show
is then in the hands of the stage manager, and the director is free to move on
to another project.
QUESTION - Which aspect of the directors job do you
feel would be the most challenging or difficult to accomplish?